On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 11:17 -0700, Brett Cornwall wrote:

On 2020-10-19 12:59, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:

...

Dear Trust User,

        I submitted an Orphaning request in both comment area and ticket system. Feel free to let me know if there is anything I need to do to follow up.

        My email address is daimh@umich.edu , just in case I missed any emails.

Best, Manhong

It's been made clear that you're not willing to listen to TUs and would rather engage in what appears to be bordering on harassment with the new maintainer. If you had demonstrated a clear attempt to actually understand the responses to your mails in this list then there might have been recourse. As it stands, you're merely digging your own grave.

I am more than willing to listen to TU, as well as any other users. As what you said is all opinion, it is hard for me to reply. But let me try. If you referring to that I top-posted before, I already apologized. Also a fun fact, I have been top-posting in my whole life, and I never saw a non-top-posting email in the past two decades in USA. Further it was very hard to read non-top-post emails on phone, at least for me for now. Or if you think I am harassing the new maintainer, please show me what words are harassment, I am happy to apologize and modify it. At least I didn't call anybody "zero knowledge", or "know nothing", etc, did I? Please shed some light on what I or any other AUR maintainers who didn't register AUR-general should do in this case, before the package was taken over. If it is I should always reply comment, that's a very high bar, at least for me, especially if I see a simple patch file is split into many small files. Best, Manhong

If the new maintainer wants your help, he'll add you as a co- maintainer. If they do not, then leave them be and put your PKGBUILD elsewhere.

On Mon, 2020-10-19 at 20:41 +0200, Iyán Méndez Veiga wrote:

On Monday, 19 October 2020 20:32:23 CEST Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:

...

I am more than willing to listen to TU, as well as any other users.

Okay, let's see if that's true and you keep learning. Can you please do me (all of us?) a favour and stop spamming in this email list. And yes, I find your actitute way offensive. Not only here but also with your comments in AUR.

As you have been told by the SGE (Son of Grid Engine) maintainer, you are more than welcome to submit a new sge-daimh or some-grid-engine package to AUR with all your modifications/patches from SGE.

I don't think this is spamming. Because I mentioned many facts and reasons in my last comment at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sge/ But here is some points in case you don't want to read it. 1, My code modification's copyright is not disclaimed, as all my works belong to University of Michigan. 2, If an AUR maintainer is not required to join this list, and an AUR web system's bug caused the email problem, I did nothing wrong before my top-posting. Yes, I am annoying, but I was as innocent as a newborn. (Well, before my top-posting) 3, Also, here is git diff of the bug fix that the current maintainer just submitted. He knew 'makepkg' fails, but he publish the file anyway, and now he modified it because of my Orphaning request..... - cd "${pkgname}-${pkgver}/source" + "cd ${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}/source" If you feel I am spamming, I am so sorry for your feeling. But I would think this is helpful for me, the new maintainer and all other AUR maintainers. Best, Manhong

Best regards, Iyán