ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) was created to update ipset (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16553). The maintainer is happy for it to be removed (see comments).
Gadget3000
On 30 August 2011 09:56, gadget3000 gadget3000@msn.com wrote:
john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152) was created to either update [community] or include a patch which is now included in [community] anyway. It's just been orphaned.
Gadget3000
On 29 August 2011 20:46, gadget3000 gadget3000@msn.com wrote:
*Packages created to update others:* haskell-xmpp-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32418) was created to update haskell-xmpp ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30218) more quickly. The maintainer is happy for it to be deleted, as stated in the comments. hdate-applet-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42660) was created to update hdate-applet ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4353) more quickly (I presume). It currently has no votes or maintainer. hspell-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44608) presumably had similar intentions for hspell [extra]. It currently has no votes or maintainer. pyblosxom-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35982) presumably had similar intentions for pyblosxom ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253) and is maintained by an inactive maintainer so it has old dependencies that haven't worked since at least Oct 2010. stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned. stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.
*Packages created for other reasons:* idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly named and should be called idjc-git lazarus-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26708) is poorly named and should be called lazarus-svn, which already exists ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18729) but is orphaned. reciteword-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41925) was created to fix the PKGBUILD of pyblosxom ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253), which is currently orphaned. spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained. xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what happens with this one. yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this one. Let me know what you think.
*Awaiting maintainer responses:* ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152) josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569) metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739)
And that's the current, whole list processed!
Gadget3000
On 29 August 2011 14:20, Stefan Husmann stefan-husmann@t-online.dewrote:
Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000:
*Packages created to update others:*
dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51785https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785) wanted to update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has 1 vote. deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=35144https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144) has similar intentions for deja-dup (https://aur.archlinux.org/** packages.php?ID=28835 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28835). I have just flagged deja-dup as out of date. evilvte-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51769https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51769) had similar intentions for evilvte (https://aur.archlinux.org/** packages.php?ID=16727 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727) and has since been abandoned. It has no votes. extcalc-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=36578https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36578) has similar intentions for extcalc (https://aur.archlinux.org/** packages.php?ID=22084 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22084 ), which was a year out of date at the time of extcalc-new's creation. flashrom-svn-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45519https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45519) had similar intentions for flashrom-svn ( https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=23390https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390). It has since been abandoned and may have even been deleted before. fmit-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51160https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51160) had similar intentions but the maintainer want's it deleted. gabedit-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47301https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47301) had similar intentions for gabedit (https://aur.archlinux.org/** packages.php?ID=34230 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230) but is now itself out of date. It has no votes. gtkglarea-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=31353https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31353) had similar intentions for gtkglarea ( https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=901https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=901). It has since been abandoned.
Most were deleted. Some were not yet, because I wrote a comment and want to give a chance to read them to the the maintainer.
Thank you for your efforts.
On 30 August 2011 12:09, gadget3000 gadget3000@msn.com wrote:
ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) was created to update ipset (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16553). The maintainer is happy for it to be removed (see comments).
Deleted, thanks.
2011/8/30 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkovsky@gmail.com
On 30 August 2011 12:09, gadget3000 gadget3000@msn.com wrote:
ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) was created
to
update ipset (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16553). The maintainer is happy for it to be removed (see comments).
Deleted, thanks.
Hi everyone,
It's been a week since I tried to get in contact with some of these maintainers and some packages have been deleted since, so here is the final aurdupes -A list.
*Packages created to update others:* stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.
stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.
*Packages created for other reasons:* idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly named and should be called idjc-git spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained. xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what happens with this one. yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this one. Let me know what you think. josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569) is poorly named and should be called something like josm-devel metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739). I'm not sure why this was created because the maintainer of metslib-newest and metslib is the same. Metslib-newest is more up to date than metslib though.
Gadget3000
It's been a week since I tried to get in contact with some of these maintainers and some packages have been deleted since, so here is the final aurdupes -A list.
*Packages created to update others:* stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.
Done.
stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.
Done
*Packages created for other reasons:* idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly named and should be called idjc-git spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained. xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what happens with this one. yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this one. Let me know what you think. josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569) is poorly named and should be called something like josm-devel metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739). I'm not sure why this was created because the maintainer of metslib-newest and metslib is the same. Metslib-newest is more up to date than metslib though.
I've left these ones alone. I agree that the naming could be better, but they seem to work. However josm-latest should really be improved to incorporate md5sums, maybe using snapshot.
2011/9/15 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkovsky@gmail.com:
It's been a week since I tried to get in contact with some of these maintainers and some packages have been deleted since, so here is the final aurdupes -A list.
*Packages created to update others:* stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned.
Done.
stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438). It also is orphaned and has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned.
Done
*Packages created for other reasons:* idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly named and should be called idjc-git spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained. xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what happens with this one. yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this one. Let me know what you think. josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569) is poorly named and should be called something like josm-devel metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739). I'm not sure why this was created because the maintainer of metslib-newest and metslib is the same. Metslib-newest is more up to date than metslib though.
I've left these ones alone. I agree that the naming could be better, but they seem to work. However josm-latest should really be improved to incorporate md5sums, maybe using snapshot.
Also josm-svn and josm-latest-svn should be consolidated. I'll take a look at these later, and I'll probably update them.
Also josm-svn and josm-latest-svn should be consolidated. I'll take a look at these later, and I'll probably update them.
OK, I replaced the josm-svn by the (updated) the josm-latest-svn package.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org