I'm going to reply to this from now on to request deletions; makes it a little organised and easier for anyone to track instead of new mails with generic subject lines every now and then. *[ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27760 ] linux-phc-amd-module<duplicate of> phc-k8 [ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22953 ]* *[ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18310 ] acpi-cpufreq-phc<deprecated by> phc-intel [ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24980 ]*
Ray Rashif schivmeister@gmail.com wrote:
*[ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27760 ] linux-phc-amd-module<duplicate of> phc-k8 [ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22953 ]* *[ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18310 ] acpi-cpufreq-phc<deprecated by> phc-intel [ http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24980 ]*
Deleted.
-- Chris
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19507 - renamed to ffado http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19112 - renamed to ffado-svn
(there's no need for a reply, just delete them)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:31:13 +0800 Ray Rashif schivmeister@gmail.com wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19507 - renamed to ffado http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19112 - renamed to ffado-svn
(there's no need for a reply, just delete them)
I'm just a user, but have you thought of, that these replies are also of help for the TUs in coordinating their time?
Just my 2 cents… - -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
Thoresten Toepper wrote:
I'm just a user, but have you thought of, that these replies are also of help for the TUs in coordinating their time? Just my 2 cents.
That's a good point. FWIW, I deleted the original poster's packages.
-- Chris
2009/10/23 Chris Brannon cmbrannon79@gmail.com
Thoresten Toepper wrote:
I'm just a user, but have you thought of, that these replies are also of help for the TUs in coordinating their time? Just my 2 cents.
That's a good point. FWIW, I deleted the original poster's packages.
-- Chris
err..what I meant was there's no need for a reply if the message is just "deleted" :) I thought that would save his/her time.
Thanks and cheers!
This is more of a heads up, because I don't quite know which of the two should be deleted.
cairo-wglitz <-> cairo-glitz *
* looks like an upload just because the other was outdated, or to tango along with user's other related packages.
cairo-dock-plug-ins <-> cairo-dock-plugins *
* Again, probably it was outdated, or someone simply wanted to change the name.
2009/11/7 Ray Rashif schivmeister@gmail.com
This is more of a heads up, because I don't quite know which of the two should be deleted.
cairo-wglitz <-> cairo-glitz *
- looks like an upload just because the other was outdated, or to tango
along with user's other related packages.
cairo-dock-plug-ins <-> cairo-dock-plugins *
- Again, probably it was outdated, or someone simply wanted to change the
name.
Add another one which can be deleted immediately:
kibaplugins-svn (orphan and superseded by kiba-plugins-svn)
Ray Rashif wrote:
Add another one which can be deleted immediately:
kibaplugins-svn (orphan and superseded by kiba-plugins-svn)
Deleted.
-- Chris
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org