On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:

Biru Ionut schrieb:

...

HI, i'm opening this subject again. sorry for that.

i want to delete them tonight and i want to ask you guys which is the best package to have(and renamed) conform this proposal: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chromium_proposal

chromium-browser-svn  will not be deleted. chromium-bin i can't choose one from that list because i don't know which one is good. just tell me which one and i'll email the maintainer to upload with a different name.

Hello,

looking at the PKGBUILDS I would suggest to keep http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30463

The maintainer seems to know what he does, and he was the only one, who took part in the proposal.

Regards Stefan

So we have a user called Archlinux, how original ! http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=16475

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Laurie Clark-Michalek wrote:

...

So we have a user called Archlinux, how original ! http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=16475

And, judging from his very long winded, and factually inaccurate, comments, not exactly a person you would want to spent time in an enclosed space with.

As a side point, and maybe, just maybe, usernames like "Archlinux" should not be allowed. It may seem to some that the distribution, in an official capacity is making or has made those comments (as seen on the AUR page for this package). Just thinking outloud here. Farhan

2009/10/21 Biru Ionut : Hi,

i've deleted all packages. Now we have only two packages: chromium-browser-bin chromium-browser-svn

Although I'm happy that the jungle of chromium packages has been cleaned up, I'm less happy with the fact that chromium-browser-bin is broken on 64 bit: /opt/chromium-browser/chrome: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 I'm a bit curious why this has gone unnoticed before removing the packages. But I'm aware this is not the right place to discuss the issue itself, it already has been reported at the package page. Kind regards, -- Bram Schoenmakers What is mind? No matter. What is matter? Never mind. (Punch, 1855)

Apparently, no you did not. I maintained the chromium-snapshot package and I haven't got any mail from anyone related to the package in the past 24 hours. I know my email is correct in my AUR account as I recieve out-of-date notifications and comment notifications just fine. 2009/10/21 Biru Ionut

On 10/21/2009 02:23 AM, Panos Filip wrote:

...

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Biru Ionut wrote:

HI,

...

i'm opening this subject again. sorry for that.

i want to delete them tonight and i want to ask you guys which is the best package to have(and renamed) conform this proposal: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chromium_proposal

chromium-browser-svn will not be deleted. chromium-bin i can't choose one from that list because i don't know which one is good. just tell me which one and i'll email the maintainer to upload with a different name.

-- Ionut

I think that the best is:

1) ONE chromium-browser-bin-latest, because -latest- will make clear that it isn't a stabilized or stable release and it will download the ... latest. The one that Stefan Husmann suggests is the best I suppose. And it should be the zip from googlebot. It's the (2) (the svn build) in zip. 2) ONE chromium-browser-svn : it exists. No problem. It can be built succesfully on x86_32 and x86_64.

i've deleted all packages. Now we have only two packages: chromium-browser-bin chromium-browser-svn

Email sent to all maintainers explaining why i did that. Hope that they understand and doesn't upload any chromium packages.

-- Ionut