Re: [aur-general] chromium packages

Apparently, no you did not. I maintained the chromium-snapshot package and I haven't got any mail from anyone related to the package in the past 24 hours. I know my email is correct in my AUR account as I recieve out-of-date notifications and comment notifications just fine. 2009/10/21 Biru Ionut

On 10/21/2009 02:23 AM, Panos Filip wrote:

...

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Biru Ionut wrote:

HI,

...

i'm opening this subject again. sorry for that.

i want to delete them tonight and i want to ask you guys which is the best package to have(and renamed) conform this proposal: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Chromium_proposal

chromium-browser-svn will not be deleted. chromium-bin i can't choose one from that list because i don't know which one is good. just tell me which one and i'll email the maintainer to upload with a different name.

-- Ionut

I think that the best is:

1) ONE chromium-browser-bin-latest, because -latest- will make clear that it isn't a stabilized or stable release and it will download the ... latest. The one that Stefan Husmann suggests is the best I suppose. And it should be the zip from googlebot. It's the (2) (the svn build) in zip. 2) ONE chromium-browser-svn : it exists. No problem. It can be built succesfully on x86_32 and x86_64.

i've deleted all packages. Now we have only two packages: chromium-browser-bin chromium-browser-svn

Email sent to all maintainers explaining why i did that. Hope that they understand and doesn't upload any chromium packages.

-- Ionut