[aur-general] [REMOVAL: VOTE] filoktetes
Hi TUs, This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes. You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html My vote: yes Ronald
Ronald van Haren a écrit :
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html
My vote: yes
Ronald
YES
YES
Hey gang; I would like to make sure we reach a sufficient amount of voting TUs to make a quorum. But I would like to also not vote either way. So, if it is o.k. to do so, I vote to abstain. IF this is a problem for any reason, (like not really satisfying the quorum requirements,) please let me know and I would be happy to change my vote. Very best regards; Bob Finch Liviu Librescu - În veci pomenirea lui. (May his memory be eternal.)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
YES Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer --
Yes. Alex
2008/2/21, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com>:
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
Yes. -- Giovanni Scafora Arch Linux Trusted User (voidnull) http://www.archlinux.org linuxmania@gmail.com
Yes
Yes
Yes -- Douglas Soares de Andrade ThreePointsWeb - www.threepointsweb.com Python, Zope e Plone Archlinux Trusted User - dsa Quote: Old programmers never die; they exit to a higher shell.
Yes. And Bob, you don't have to ask permission. --vk
2008/2/21, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com>:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html
My vote: yes
Ronald
YES.
Abstain. --Abhishek Dasgupta
2008/2/21, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com>:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html
yes. BTW, we could already start using AUR voting interface for this vote. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
YES! ps: Shouldnt we use the new AUR vote interface? -- []'s Hugo Doria http://hdoria.archlinux-br.org :wq
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 21:13 +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html
My vote: yes
Ronald
Abstain.
Ronald van Haren wrote:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html
My vote: yes
Ronald
Yes. Shinlun
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:13:08 +0100 "Ronald van Haren" <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi TUs,
This mail starts the 5 day voting period for the removal of filoktetes.
You can find the official discussion period here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/007010.html The reasoning why I started this removal thread can be found here: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2008-February/006988.html
My vote: yes
Ronald
yes -- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User
Yes. -- Jaroslaw Swierczynski <swiergot@gmail.com> www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com
Abstain
This mail ends the voting period for the removal as Trusted User of filoktetes. 21/27 (of which 3 inactive, and filoktetes not allowed to vote) TUs voted, of which 16: yes 5: abstain This means we have a quorum, and filoktetes is no longer a Trusted User. I removed him from the trusted users wiki page. Please remove his cvs account, change his account on the forums etc. if you have the power to do so. Thanks. As a sidenote, the following [community] packages become available (see the AUR webinterface for more information): advancemame 0.106.0-3 advancemenu 2.4.13-4 advanceutils 0.106.0-1 aldrin 0.11-1 alexandria 0.6.1-5 denemo 0.7.6-1 diacanvas 0.14.4-1 elisa 0.3.2-1 gavl 0.2.5-1 gjots2 2.3.7-1 gnuconcept 0.3.5-1 kernel26eee 2.6.24-1 libquicktime 1.0.1-2 libzzub 0.2.3-1 lilypond 2.10.33-1 linux-uvc-svn 182-2 mhwaveedit 1.4.14-1 mlt++ 0.2.2-5 mlt-svn 1036-1 openmovieeditor 0.0.20071010-1 openoffice-nb 2.3.1rc1-2 openoffice-nn 2.3.1rc1-2 openoffice-spell-no 2.0.9-1 pigment 0.3.2-1 powertop 1.9-1 pyzzub 0.2.3-1 qtwvdialer 0.4.4-1 recoll 1.9.0-1 ruby-zoom 0.2.2-3 soundconverter 0.9.7-1 thoggen 0.6.0-2 treeline 1.0.2-1 ttf-mgopen 1.1-5 wlassistant 0.5.7-1 yaz 2.1.54-1 Please take some of these packages if you can. Thanks. Ronald
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:45:58 +0100 "Ronald van Haren" <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
advancemame 0.106.0-3 advancemenu 2.4.13-4 advanceutils 0.106.0-1 These are discontinued package, replaced by sdlmame ( already in community ). IMHO these packages should go in unsupported directly.
openoffice-nb 2.3.1rc1-2 openoffice-nn 2.3.1rc1-2 openoffice-spell-no 2.0.9-1 Adopted, I maintain most of OOo language file, so these 3 aren't a problem.
-- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User
JJDaNiMoTh wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:45:58 +0100 "Ronald van Haren" <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
advancemame 0.106.0-3 advancemenu 2.4.13-4 advanceutils 0.106.0-1
These are discontinued package, replaced by sdlmame ( already in community ). IMHO these packages should go in unsupported directly.
Well, do you want to add the replaces line to the sdlmame PKGBUILD first?
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:09 +1000 Allan McRae <mcrae_allan@hotmail.com> wrote:
JJDaNiMoTh wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:45:58 +0100 "Ronald van Haren" <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
advancemame 0.106.0-3 advancemenu 2.4.13-4 advanceutils 0.106.0-1
These are discontinued package, replaced by sdlmame ( already in community ). IMHO these packages should go in unsupported directly.
Well, do you want to add the replaces line to the sdlmame PKGBUILD first?
Replaced not in the 'maintainer' sense, there are different package, isn't a fork. A lot of user has already switched long time ago. -- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:45:58AM +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:
I removed him from the trusted users wiki page. Please remove his cvs account, change his account on the forums etc. if you have the power to do so. Thanks.
done. just a sidenote, any tu can take care of the aur account portion, which involves looking up a user and changing the type, as well as orphaning any of their community packages. -S
2008/2/27, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com>:
alexandria 0.6.1-5 denemo 0.7.6-1 diacanvas 0.14.4-1 gnuconcept 0.3.5-1 kernel26eee 2.6.24-1 linux-uvc-svn 182-2 recoll 1.9.0-1 soundconverter 0.9.7-1 wlassistant 0.5.7-1 yaz 2.1.54-1 Adopted
-- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User: #430842
participants (24)
-
Aaron Schaefer
-
Abhishek Dasgupta
-
Alexander Fehr
-
Allan McRae
-
bardo
-
BaSh
-
Bjørn Lindeijer
-
Douglas Soares de Andrade
-
Firmicus
-
Giovanni Scafora
-
Hugo Doria
-
Jaroslaw Swierczynski
-
JJDaNiMoTh
-
Mateusz Herych
-
Roman Kyrylych
-
Ronald van Haren
-
Sebastian Nowicki
-
Sergej Pupykin
-
Shinlun Hsieh
-
Simo Leone
-
Timm Preetz
-
Vesa Kaihlavirta
-
Vinay Shastry
-
w9ya＠qrparci.net