[aur-general] delete package
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936 Same as fftw2 at community. Thanks
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936
Same as fftw2 at community.
The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge? Pete.
Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936
Same as fftw2 at community.
The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?
Pete.
fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
On 26 November 2010 16:44, Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@lavabit.com> wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936
Same as fftw2 at community.
The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?
Pete.
fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
Yes, I agree.
On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936
Same as fftw2 at community.
The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?
Pete.
fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 yet). The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or not. Pete.
On 26 November 2010 18:23, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936
Same as fftw2 at community.
The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?
Pete.
fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 yet). The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or not.
Confirmed. fftw2double needs to stay. It doesn't conflict with fftw2 anyway (different library name), and rezound depends on it exclusively. Rezound does not build against fftw2 or fftw(-threads).
Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-11-26 12:31:57 +0100:
On 26 November 2010 18:23, Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100:
On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote:
fftw2double http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936
Same as fftw2 at community.
The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a separate pacakge?
Pete.
fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound maintainers should adapt their packages though. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594
Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 yet). The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or not.
Confirmed. fftw2double needs to stay. It doesn't conflict with fftw2 anyway (different library name), and rezound depends on it exclusively. Rezound does not build against fftw2 or fftw(-threads).
Sorry, I missed the 2/3
participants (4)
-
Joao Cordeiro
-
Peter Lewis
-
Philipp Überbacher
-
Ray Rashif