[aur-general] xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries [done right]
On 12/05/2016 02:41 AM, NicoHood wrote:
--> I hope this is in a new post now. Sorry Eli Schwartz, I did not know that the ML gets messed up like this.
Clicking Reply means it isn't a new post. The whole point of replying is that it links back to the email you were reading when you clicked "Reply". See e.g. : https://wesmorgan.blogspot.com/2012/07/understanding-email-headers-part-ii.h... "Compose" a brand-new email and address it to aur-general@archlinux.org like everyone else who wants to post a new topic. Please. You can save context, by copy-pasting a quote from the email you want to reply to and inserting it in your *brand-new* email. -- Eli Schwartz
On 12/05/2016 03:07 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 12/05/2016 02:41 AM, NicoHood wrote:
--> I hope this is in a new post now. Sorry Eli Schwartz, I did not know that the ML gets messed up like this.
Clicking Reply means it isn't a new post. The whole point of replying is that it links back to the email you were reading when you clicked "Reply". See e.g. : https://wesmorgan.blogspot.com/2012/07/understanding-email-headers-part-ii.h...
"Compose" a brand-new email and address it to aur-general@archlinux.org like everyone else who wants to post a new topic. Please.
You can save context, by copy-pasting a quote from the email you want to reply to and inserting it in your *brand-new* email.
And to demonstrate that that is indeed how you do it, notice where my email ended up: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2016-December/thread.html#... -- Eli Schwartz
Den 05-12-2016 kl. 09:10 skrev Eli Schwartz via aur-general:
And to demonstrate that that is indeed how you do it, notice where my email ended up: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2016-December/thread.html#...
To be fair though, it looks like the web interface only threads on subject name (see how "xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin unused shared libraries" isn't part of the "TU Application: Baptiste Jonglez" thread), so this would be due to you change of the subject (" [done right]"). -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen https://freso.dk/ AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso
I tied ./configure LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed" as suggested here: https://sigquit.wordpress.com/2011/02/16/why-asneeded-doesnt-work-as-expecte... The website covers the issue really good, however the fix does not seem to work. Does this has to do something with the way arch runs make? I also found those two posts on the ML: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2011-March/012705.html https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2011-March/012700.html It looks to me that this is still not fixed for arch nor upstream!? The generated makefile contains: LDFLAGS = -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro Even if I use it does still not work and give the warnings: LDFLAGS = -Wl,--as-needed Also something that might be of interest: LIBNOTIFY_LIBS = -lnotify -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 LIBXFCE4PANEL_LIBS = -lxfce4panel-2.0 -lgtk-3 -lgdk-3 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -latk-1.0 -lcairo-gobject -lcairo -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgmodule-2.0 -pthread -lxfce4util -lglib-2.0 You can clearly see that all not required libs are listed there. The x11 LD flags are also empty (by default). It does not help to change them: LIBX11_LDFLAGS = I have no idea what else I could do. Any idea? ~Nico
participants (3)
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen
-
NicoHood