November 2018 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13204] Merge Request for spl-utils-common
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

minextu [1] filed a request to merge spl-utils-common [2] into spl- utils [3]: Package got renamed to the proper name [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/minextu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/spl-utils-common/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/spl-utils/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13205] Merge Request for zfs-utils-common-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

minextu [1] filed a request to merge zfs-utils-common-git [2] into zfs-utils-git [3]: Package got renamed to proper name [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/minextu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zfs-utils-common-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zfs-utils-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13185] Merge Request for yuzu-qt-canary-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

bscubed [1] filed a request to merge yuzu-qt-canary-git [2] into yuzu- canary-git [3]: Similarly to the request I made for the citra-qt-canary-git, I'd also like to request that yuzu-qt-canary-git is merged into yuzu-canary-git for the same reasons listed in my citra merge request. For simplicity's sake, having two packages leads to confusion, and both packages are built exactly the same way. Therefore, why waste compute time compiling the same source twice when you can do both in one compilation and provide everything in one package? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bscubed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/yuzu-qt-canary-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/yuzu-canary-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13184] Merge Request for citra-qt-canary-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

bscubed [1] filed a request to merge citra-qt-canary-git [2] into citra-canary-git [3]: I have spoken with the lead developer for Citra, and we've come to the conclusion that having two separate packages for a QT-based version and a command line version is unnecessary. Two versions leads to confusion (See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/7im2r8/aur_packages_citragit_an…). I'd like to request that the QT version is merged into the command line version to provide both runtimes in one package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bscubed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/citra-qt-canary-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/citra-canary-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#12973] Merge Request for sublime-text-dev-imfix2
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

bianjp [1] filed a request to merge sublime-text-dev-imfix2 [2] into sublime-text-dev-imfix [3]: I created this package two years ago since sublime-text-dev-imfix is not actively maintained. Now that I've taken control of sublime-text- dev-imfix, there is no need to maintain this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bianjp/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sublime-text-dev-imfix2/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sublime-text-dev-imfix/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13011] Orphan Request for vue-cli
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 12 Nov '18

12 Nov '18

tiberiousr [1] filed a orphan request for vue-cli [2]: This package is broken as is and the maintainer has not updated in over two months. I'm happy to take over maintenance of the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tiberiousr/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vue-cli/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13074] Orphan Request for icu58
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 11 Nov '18

11 Nov '18

niksac [1] filed a orphan request for icu58 [2]: Hi I've an updated PKGBUILD that compile [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/niksac/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/icu58/

2 2

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13194] Orphan Request for icu58
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Nov '18

10 Nov '18

petronny [1] filed a orphan request for icu58 [2]: Can't build and no response from the maintainer for a long time. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/petronny/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/icu58/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13199] Deletion Request for python-botocore-legacy
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Nov '18

10 Nov '18

yan12125 [1] filed a deletion request for python-botocore-legacy [2]: This package was created as python-moto wasn't compatible with the latest botocore/boto3. Issues are now resolved in the latest python- moto. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-botocore-legacy/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13200] Deletion Request for python-boto3-legacy
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Nov '18

10 Nov '18

yan12125 [1] filed a deletion request for python-boto3-legacy [2]: This package was created as python-moto wasn't compatible with the latest botocore/boto3. Issues are now resolved in the latest python- moto. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-boto3-legacy/

1 1