As I commented in the AUR comments[1] I was not aware of the existence of a
ttf-topaz package since I did not search by topaz but by topaz-unicode
which is actually the name of the font in the upstream[2] and since I saw
that it did not exist I created the package.
From my point of view the one that should be removed is the ttf-topaz[3] as
it does not correspond to the real name of the upstream.
In any case I have offered to be co-maintainer of this package to vcalv[4]
which I think is the best thing to do.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-topaz-unicode
[2]: https://gitlab.com/Screwtapello/topaz-unicode
[3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-topaz
[4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vcalv/
El mar, 30 ene 2024 a las 14:55,
vcalv [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-topaz-unicode [2]:
Duplicate of ttf-topaz that was already submitted.
No new function in this package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vcalv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-topaz-unicode/
-- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me