Hi dakataca, I also left (part of) this message on the package, just in case you aren't on the mailing list or something. Why exactly was this request created? I don't see a case where these should be merged to be honest. The spflahtool5 [3] package was created way after spflashtol5-bin [2] and I'm unable to see why. The more logical thing seems to be a deletion of spflashtool5 [3] as a duplicate. If you're providing a variant with different options, they shouldn't be merged either; in that case, update it to clearly reflect what the differences are. If you have any suggestions or improvements for spflashtool5-bin [2], feel free to leave a comment there or send me a message. Kind regards, Omar On do, okt 19 2023 at 16:41:35 +00:00:00, notify@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
dakataca [1] filed a request to merge spflashtool5-bin [2] into spflashtool5 [3]:
It would be a good idea to combine the best of both PKGBUILDs, and the same version of spflashtool.
[1] <https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dakataca/> [2] <https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/spflashtool5-bin/> [3] <https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/spflashtool5/>