As I commented in the AUR comments[1] I was not aware of the existence of a ttf-topaz package since I did not search by topaz but by topaz-unicode which is actually the name of the font in the upstream[2] and since I saw that it did not exist I created the package. From my point of view the one that should be removed is the ttf-topaz[3] as it does not correspond to the real name of the upstream. In any case I have offered to be co-maintainer of this package to vcalv[4] which I think is the best thing to do. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-topaz-unicode [2]: https://gitlab.com/Screwtapello/topaz-unicode [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-topaz [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vcalv/ El mar, 30 ene 2024 a las 14:55, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> escribió:

vcalv [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-topaz-unicode [2]:

Duplicate of ttf-topaz that was already submitted.

No new function in this package.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vcalv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-topaz-unicode/

-- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me