[PRQ#75053] Deletion Request for opencode
envolution [1] filed a deletion request for opencode [2]: Maintainer is aware that including binary packages in a non-bin namespace is not correct, and continues committing updates here several times daily. This package has been merged and deleted based on this more than once: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/IDPYIMVZ2UHDINZNWLMFDC27IUYS5ZRZ/ https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/QQGT4YFLYRFFZN536CIVHMIPTJWZOHP7/ Maintainer has confirmed his intention of only submitting binary releases in: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/HTTWLJSRHPWHJNUEUAVKS2ULI5XR7ER6/ Maintainer has been informed that this package is a duplicate of aur/opencode-bin and suggested it was an error (1 month ago) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencode-bin#comment-1030701 Maintainer was contacted letting him know his CI actions were recreating aur/opencode with binaries here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencode#comment-1033898 and here: https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/1358 His new reasoning is that it's to prevent namesquatters. I am concerned that deleting this package will (again) only be a temporary measure - considering opencode-bin seems popular, and is generated by the project's github actions - maybe at least for now block the opencode namespace or free up both to allow others them as per the guidelines [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/envolution/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opencode/
we've removed opencode from our CI process we have had issues with people publishing fake versions under the opencode name (see opencode-ai-bin) so we were trying to protect the name if this happens again i expect action to be taken Sent via Superhuman <https://sprh.mn/?vip=d@ironbay.co> On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 4:58 PM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
envolution [1] filed a deletion request for opencode [2]:
Maintainer is aware that including binary packages in a non-bin namespace is not correct, and continues committing updates here several times daily. This package has been merged and deleted based on this more than once:
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/IDPYIMVZ2UHDINZNWLMFDC27IUYS5ZRZ/
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/QQGT4YFLYRFFZN536CIVHMIPTJWZOHP7/
Maintainer has confirmed his intention of only submitting binary releases in: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists. archlinux.org/message/HTTWLJSRHPWHJNUEUAVKS2ULI5XR7ER6/
Maintainer has been informed that this package is a duplicate of aur/opencode-bin and suggested it was an error (1 month ago) https://aur. archlinux.org/packages/opencode-bin#comment-1030701
Maintainer was contacted letting him know his CI actions were recreating aur/opencode with binaries here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencode#comment-1033898 and here: https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/1358
His new reasoning is that it's to prevent namesquatters.
I am concerned that deleting this package will (again) only be a temporary measure - considering opencode-bin seems popular, and is generated by the project's github actions - maybe at least for now block the opencode namespace or free up both to allow others them as per the guidelines
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/envolution/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opencode/
On Sat Aug 2, 2025 at 4:58 PM EDT, notify wrote:
envolution [1] filed a deletion request for opencode [2]:
Maintainer is aware that including binary packages in a non-bin namespace is not correct, and continues committing updates here several times daily. This package has been merged and deleted based on this more than once:
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/IDPYIMVZ2UHDINZNWLMFDC27IUYS5ZRZ/
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/QQGT4YFLYRFFZN536CIVHMIPTJWZOHP7/
Maintainer has confirmed his intention of only submitting binary releases in: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/HTTWLJSRHPWHJNUEUAVKS2ULI5XR7ER6/
Maintainer has been informed that this package is a duplicate of aur/opencode-bin and suggested it was an error (1 month ago) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencode-bin#comment-1030701
Maintainer was contacted letting him know his CI actions were recreating aur/opencode with binaries here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencode#comment-1033898 and here: https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/1358
His new reasoning is that it's to prevent namesquatters.
I am concerned that deleting this package will (again) only be a temporary measure - considering opencode-bin seems popular, and is generated by the project's github actions - maybe at least for now block the opencode namespace or free up both to allow others them as per the guidelines
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/envolution/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opencode/
The automated CI now only points to opencode-bin so it seems it's okay to just accept the deletion request without further action. They've commented the AUR section out likely for the recent network issues. https://github.com/sst/opencode/pull/1907 https://github.com/sst/opencode/pull/1907/files
Request #75053 has been Accepted by Muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for opencode. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
participants (3)
-
envolution
-
notify＠aur.archlinux.org
-
thdxr