On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Aaron Griffin<aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Xavier<shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Dan McGee<dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/3/23 Samed Beyribey <ras0ir@eventualis.org>:
Well i just noticed that, (probably) mailman rejects my attachment (it was 9.5k) so i've put it on my web site: http://eventualis.org/pacman/0001-fixed-typos-and-alignment-problem-in-Turki...
This is my last mail about this patch, again, i feel so sorry.
This isn't your fault.
Aaron, do we not allow gzipped and bzipped files through?
I guess not. What's the mime-type for these? Considering mailman uses a whitelist, would anyone be able to construct a decent list that covers pretty much all attachment types we'd want?
Thanks for changing the subject, btw. Here is a simple look at that patch, gzipped and additionally unzipped and converted to bzip2.
dmcgee@galway /tmp $ file --mime-type patch.gz patch.gz: application/x-gzip
dmcgee@galway /tmp $ file --mime-type patch.bz2 patch.bz2: application/x-bzip2
bump :)
Allowed attachments: multipart/mixed multipart/alternative message/rfc822 text/plain multipart/signed application/pgp-signature application/octet-stream application/x-tar application/x-tgz application/x-gzip application/x-bzip-compressed-tar application/x-bzip2
As an FYI, I added the last 5 this morning, but for this list (as opposed to the arch-* lists), we can probably allow everything through as I haven't seen rampant abuse. -Dan