Re: [pacman-dev] [patch] resolvedeps cleanup + pactest, alpm_list_add

I noticed you added that comment in the code, but I really don't understand why.. Either before or after your patch, I don't see why this assumption is needed. Or maybe it isn't needed for that resolvedeps function itself, but for the code which use the result of resolvedeps ?

Just to be quick: It can be seen from function definition: alpm_list_t *list is used instead of **list. Bye, ngaba ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.