8*?) Tidy up bash_completion stuff? (FS#16630) The poster disappeared and he tried to sneak a license change in there, so that just hit a bit of a roadblock. I'd like to improve
so I might just sit down and hack at it myself. "Tried to sneak a license change"? From your own ml: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Andres Perera <andres...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Dan McGee <dpmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is this strictly necessary? You are changing one piece of code in
On 05/05/10 at 18:31:22 CEST, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote: this the
entire codebase to require v3 or later and as weird as it sounds, I am not going to let that fly. I won't be merging this unless it is v2 or you give some darn good reasons why we should move to v3. Not really necessary. You can change it to v2, or I can do that if it requires a commit from me. Nah that's good enough for me. I'll try to give this whole thing a workout in the next day or two and see if I can come up with anything else that we might want to tweak, however. -Dan http://www.mail-archive.com/pacman-dev@archlinux.org/msg04127.html Maybe I was a little harsh? Anyway, I don't care if you put a random bash script I wrote ages ago under GPL, Public Domain, BSD... lol, Andres P