On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:22:37 +0200, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/28/06, Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:28PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Ok, I think it's about time I picked up pacman developement, seeing as we really have no one else doing it. I've been busy, so I was really hoping someone else would volunteer, but what the hell.
I'll get your back when I can, Aaron. I've merged most of the libarchive stuff in, but it's not committed yet. For some reason, the static linking fails. Dynamic one works fine. I tested this with FW's pacman and I had the same error, so it's likely something on my system, not in the pacman build setup.
While you're available... do you seriously like sw=2 ts=2 ? I was going to bring that up and see if it offended anyone to switch to 4/4 - though I guess if you just use noet, and remove those settings, it'd be up to the editor (modelines override editor settings).
Good to see some action here again :) I wanted to see if the slow operation with XFS/JFS? could be improved. So i made a script that finds packages without using pacman. It's called pacfind. or whatever you want to call it :) (i think someone alreayd have made a pacfind script? #!/bin/sh if [ "$1" = "-Sd" -a -n "$2" ] then cd /var/lib/pacman/ grep -r -A 1 DESC *|grep -v local/|egrep "desc-.*$2.*"|sed 's/.*desc-/^[[1;33m&\n^[[1;37m/'|sed 's/\/desc-//' # grep -A 1 DESC */*/desc didn't work for some reason :/ elif [ "$1" = "-Ss" -a -n "$2" ] then cd /var/lib/ find pacman -name "*$2*"|grep -ve /local -e '.*testing$' -e '.*AqD$' -e '.*brain0$' -e '.*community$' -e '.*current$' -e '.*extra$' -e '.*karsten$' -e '.*unstable$'|xargs grep -r -A 1 DESC|grep -v DESC -v |grep -v -- --|sed 's|^pacman/||'|sed 's/.*desc-/^[[1;33m&\n^[[1;37m/'|sed 's/\/desc-//' fi # the escape codes won't work ofc. # The -Sd search packgae descriptions # The -Ss search only packagenames Results: searching for packagename takes 15-16 sec now which used to take 1.04m with pacman -Ss -Sd takes 56 sec but is really quite faster than pacman's 1.04m because it starts sooner and only spits out the info slower because of coloring, i suppose. So there's definitively some ground to be covered for pacman and I really hope that pacman3 won't have to be db dependent <:) Also my script could probably be improved by some of you bash gurus :) and also have you guys seen this?: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=22872&highlight=pacman+poll :) me out! -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/