On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 03:11:36PM +0100, VMiklos <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:07:59PM +0100, VMiklos <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
hmm. you mean _every_ function that is not declared in alpm.h?
Excepted static ones, yes.
ok, then i take this
http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/_alpm.diff
is there any reason why this was not commented? 1) as reviewing the patches takes sometimes weeks, we had to create our own tree 2) so every patch has to be backported manually 3) this patch is rather trivial 4) it implements Aurel's idea (not a Frugalware one) 5) you know that the patch was affected almost everything, and yes, it no longer applies sorry, but this is a bit annoying. i really don't want to port it again to your cvs possible sollutions i see: - speeding up reviewing the patches a bit (apply/reject them in a week) - giving cvs write access comments? udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org