16 Apr
2007
16 Apr
'07
12:14 p.m.
... it may be buggy, but the fix should not be about slowing down the function so much I don't agree on this. This will be slower iff the old one produces a wrong result. If the result is not important why don't you delete this function from source?
currently it is done in a minute even on a slower machine. Jesus, do you mean that this is fast? :-S This is an other reason for implementing this function correctly or remove it completely.
Bye, ngaba