Idézés Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
The original patch from Nagy tried to resolve target vs target conflicts, and so broke the following pactests : sync040, sync041 and sync990
Nagy's proposal to solve this situation was to choose the interactive way, ask the user how to deal with it: either remove pkg1 or remove pkg2 or stop here. So he left this as a TODO.
But instead of trying to resolve these conflicts or asking the user, I simply made pacman fail in this case. It's simpler, and still acceptable in my opinion. However, this broke the following pactests : sync893, sync897, sync898, sync992, sync999 But some of them are rather strange.. Reference: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-October/009745.html
Signed-off-by: Chantry Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com>
I hope it's not too confusing :) I wrote the git log from my POV, but let Nagy the author of the commit :p
Thanks a lot again. Sometimes I feel that you should use 'Chantry Xavier and Nagy Gabor' [or 'Chantry Xavier' only ;-] as the author ;-) Bye ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/