2 Apr
2007
2 Apr
'07
7:33 p.m.
On 4/1/07, Nagy Gabor
Hi! We have this nice function, but it is very rarely used in libalpm source. In most cases it is reimplemented (see trans.c/_alpm_trans_update_depends for example); but there is a bigger problem: in many cases only a package-name comparison is used to check dependencies, which may lead problems (I concerned about this in my previous mails: http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-March/002155.html for example). So the whole source should be checked, and this would lead to a much cleaner and more bug-free code.
patches are welcome