30 Dec
2006
30 Dec
'06
3:34 a.m.
I didn't think about that. That is probably the smarter choice. I'm
sort of new the libalpm programming, so I haven't gotten the style down
yet.
~ Jamie / yankees26
* VMiklos
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 03:59:10PM -0500, James Rosten
wrote: -pmpkg_t *_alpm_pkg_load(char *pkgfile) +/* function for _alpm_pkg_load */ +int _alpm_pkg_checker(archive *archive, archive_entry *entry, pmpkg_t *info, char *pkgfile)
why don't you just call it pkg_checker and make it static?
udv / greetings, VMiklos
I didn't think about that. That is probably the smarter choice. I'm sort of new the libalpm programming, so I haven't gotten the style down yet. ~ Jamie / yankees26