On 01/02/17 at 07:20pm, git@stefan-klinger.de wrote:
On 2017-Jan-02, Andrew Gregory wrote with possible deletions:
On 01/02/17 at 05:10pm, Stefan Klinger wrote:
I've noticed that exactly one `Exec` directive is allowed in alpm-hooks(5). Instead, multiple occurrences are silently ignored. I think raising an error would be best
Multiple "assignments" are not going away. Triggers can have multiple Targets and forcing people to cram them all on one line is a terrible idea. This is also how multi-value options in pacman's configuration are parsed.
Ok, if that actually is usual behavior in ini-style files, so be it. Could we print a warning if information is lost by reassigning Exec? I have updated my proposal [1] accordingly.
____________________ [1] https://github.com/s5k6/pacman/tree/fix-hook-exec
As I said before, I have no real opinion one way or the other about issuing a warning/error on overwriting single-value options, so I'll leave that to Allan. If you want your patch to actually be reviewed, though, you need to submit it to this list with `git send-email`. apg