On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae <mcrae_allan@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sure. Is there any warning message that is actually useful when using those two options? I can't think of anything but you and Dan know the code-base far better than I do.
There might be some useful warning / error messages in case something is wrong, like a corrupted database or other problems like that. But I would think that most of them would happen on normal -S operations too, so it might not be a big problem. I am not sure though.
Why not screen it down to errors only? That way we don't hid those if they occur, but the warnings that these messages omit will be gone. I would rather not have special case handling for these in the backend code. -Dan