Re: [pacman-dev] pacman and maintainers

On 10/16/07, Aaron Griffin wrote:

On 10/16/07, Dan McGee wrote:

...

To Scott: I guess I'm missing your point here. What is wrong with contacting the last packager with any problems?

This was going to be my point. Regardless of maintainer, whoever built the last package should be responsible for the working state of it.

I was making the same point that Mateusz Jędrasik made while I was typing my response. I didn't realize it was an automated process. Yes, I absolutely agree that the last uploader should be considered the packager, that was exactly what I was trying to get across too. It would be good if the website showed "packager" instead of, or in addition to, "maintainer" in the package info listing, since that is the person we'd be apt to contact. (To be honest, I dislike the subtle distinction..) Scott