Re: [pacman-dev] Libalpm direction and usage by others

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Loui wrote:

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:37:16 +0100 Miklos Vajna wrote:

...

fwiw, there were working python bindings (and libpacman still has ones), but then problem with it was it violated KISS, so it was removed.

Was that to make libalpm development easier? Do you have any more information? Thanks.

They were removed because we didn't really do anything on top of what swig output. So we assumed the following: * Anyone could use swig to generate the same bindings * A more focused project for python bindings would do a better job at it