6 May
2010
6 May
'10
1:34 a.m.
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On second thought, I think I've ripped apart my own branches on this very issue several times, so don't think that just any code is going to be good enough to get in. This is tricky stuff, especially when balancing being both non-obtrusive yet still secure.
I agree completely. The most we think about the issue, the better the implementation. I am would like to wait more so that other people can read the proposal and see failing points or suggest the missing parts too. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto -------------------------------------------