12 Jul
2007
12 Jul
'07
7:03 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:57:08PM +0200, ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu wrote:
I noticed you added that comment in the code, but I really don't understand why.. Either before or after your patch, I don't see why this assumption is needed. Or maybe it isn't needed for that resolvedeps function itself, but for the code which use the result of resolvedeps ?
Just to be quick: It can be seen from function definition: alpm_list_t *list is used instead of **list.
Hm I see, but isn't that weird ? Wouldn't it be better to use **list instead then ? Or having resolvedeps return this list ?