On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 12:30:27PM +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
If I could make a suggestion: if it were up to me, I'd do 3. first, as it bugs me the most. But my preferred solution of 3. depends on my pending patches. So I'm waiting for you patiently ;-) And 3. needs some deeper changes (the code must be almost ready for the universal transaction, because I'd prefer upgrade and remove list instead of pmsyncpkg_t). And I'm a bit unsure: http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2007-September/009448.html / "so the real question is: do we need this glue?" + 1.
I don't really know about that last question, but since this would require deep changes, we indeed need to go step by step. So we first need to concentrate on getting your pending patches that go in this direction merged.