On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:18:08PM +0100, Aurelien Foret <aurelien@archlinux.org> wrote:
[10] pacman -Sw Outputs are wrong compared to pacman 2.9 Do not use log callbacks when the -w is used? or filter all outputs in trans.c depending on the downloadonly flag?
hmm. what is the problem here? $ sudo pacman2 -Suw :: fontconfig-2.3.2-7: ignoring package upgrade (2.3.93-1) :: wireless_tools: local (28.pre9-1) appears to be newer than repo (frugalware-current/27-6) :: Above packages will be skipped. To manually upgrade use 'pacman -S <pkg>' Targets: bash-completion-20050721-3 bochs-2.2.6-1 fox-1.4.29-2 gaim-1.5.0-4 gnome-session-2.12.0-3 icewm-1.2.25-1 imlib2-1.2.1-2 intltool-0.34.2-1 libwnck-2.12.2-2 mdadm-2.3-1 nmap-4.00-1 pacman-tools-0.6.4-1 pango-1.10.3-1 poppler-0.5.0-3 postfix-2.2.8-2 rrdtool-1.2.12-1 Total Package Size: 16.1 MB Proceed with download? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages from extra-current... fox-1.4.29-2-i686 [----------------] 100% 3479K 11225K/s 00:00:00 checking package integrity... done. $ sudo pacman -Suw :: Starting local database upgrade... warning: fontconfig-2.3.2-7: ignoring package upgrade (2.3.93-1) warning: wireless_tools-28.pre9-1: local version is newer resolving dependencies... done. looking for inter-conflicts... done. Targets: bash-completion-20050721-3 bochs-2.2.6-1 fox-1.4.29-2 gaim-1.5.0-4 gnome-session-2.12.0-3 icewm-1.2.25-1 imlib2-1.2.1-2 intltool-0.34.2-1 pango-1.10.3-1 libwnck-2.12.2-2 mdadm-2.3-1 nmap-4.00-1 pacman-tools-0.6.4-1 poppler-0.5.0-3 postfix-2.2.8-2 rrdtool-1.2.12-1 Total Package Size: 16.1 MB Proceed with download? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages from extra-current... fox-1.4.29-2-i686 [----------------] 100% 3479K 13672K/s 00:00:00 checking package integrity... done. btw it's interesting that the download speed is higher with pacman3 :)
[11] library symbols naming prepends private functions with "_alpm_"
=> it should be done as the last step before a first release to avoid introducing too much changes to the CVS code at once.
hmm. you mean _every_ function that is not declared in alpm.h? udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org