[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

newer
[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Update...

Ray Kohler

25 Mar 2011 25 Mar '11

10:14 p.m.

There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible. Signed-off-by: Ray Kohler --- scripts/repo-add.sh.in | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in index 9b57ba7..3d6d0c7 100644 --- a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in +++ b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name\n\ specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple\n\ packages to remove can be specified on the command line.\n\n")" printf "$(gettext "\ +Use the -s/--sign flag to sign the database with GnuPG after updating.\n\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ +Use the -v/--verify flag to verify the GnuPG signature of the database\n\ +before updating.\n\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ Use the -q/--quiet flag to minimize output to basic messages, warnings,\n\ and errors.\n\n")" printf "$(gettext "\ -- 1.7.4.1

Show replies by date

Dan McGee

25 Mar 25 Mar

10:16 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...

There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

...

Signed-off-by: Ray Kohler --- scripts/repo-add.sh.in | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in index 9b57ba7..3d6d0c7 100644 --- a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in +++ b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name\n\ specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple\n\ packages to remove can be specified on the command line.\n\n")" printf "$(gettext "\ +Use the -s/--sign flag to sign the database with GnuPG after updating.\n\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ +Use the -v/--verify flag to verify the GnuPG signature of the database\n\ +before updating.\n\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ Use the -q/--quiet flag to minimize output to basic messages, warnings,\n\ and errors.\n\n")" printf "$(gettext "\ -- 1.7.4.1

Ray Kohler

10:31 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

The -d and -f flags already suffer from the same problem of showing up is repo-remove --help, when they don't apply there. Maybe I should put conditionals in usage() to tailor it to the right invocation. Really, this usage message is a bit off anyway, as it looks nothing like that of pacman, pacman-key, or makepkg. Thoughts?

Dan McGee

10:33 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

The -d and -f flags already suffer from the same problem of showing up is repo-remove --help, when they don't apply there. Maybe I should put conditionals in usage() to tailor it to the right invocation. Really, this usage message is a bit off anyway, as it looks nothing like that of pacman, pacman-key, or makepkg. Thoughts?

Making it unified and correct for the command it is invoked for is more than welcome- +1 from me. -Dan

Allan McRae

10:38 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove. Allan

Dan McGee

10:45 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...

On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove.

-d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there. -Dan

Ray Kohler

10:54 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...
On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove.

-d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there.

That's what checking the code bears out to me as well, but I think Allan's point is that -s and -v actually do apply to repo-remove. While reading through this code, I noticed what looks like a bug - when using repo-remove to remove the very last package ("zip up some emptyness"), the repo won't be signed even if -s was given. Want me to fix that once I'm done with the usage message?

Dan McGee

10:58 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...
On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove.

-d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there.

That's what checking the code bears out to me as well, but I think Allan's point is that -s and -v actually do apply to repo-remove.

While reading through this code, I noticed what looks like a bug - when using repo-remove to remove the very last package ("zip up some emptyness"), the repo won't be signed even if -s was given. Want me to fix that once I'm done with the usage message?

Yes, it would make sense to do that. Thanks for the QA you're giving this. -Dan

Ray Kohler

11:25 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Sign database even if empty

Move the create_signature() call outside the case of non-empty databases, so it will be called regardless. Signed-off-by: Ray Kohler --- scripts/repo-add.sh.in | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in index 75b5d48..de17187 100644 --- a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in +++ b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in @@ -581,12 +581,13 @@ if (( success )); then pushd "$tmpdir" >/dev/null if [[ -n $(ls) ]]; then bsdtar -c${TAR_OPT}f "$filename" * - create_signature "$filename" else # we have no packages remaining? zip up some emptyness warning "$(gettext "No packages remain, creating empty database.")" bsdtar -c${TAR_OPT}f "$filename" -T /dev/null fi + create_signature "$filename" + popd >/dev/null [[ -f $REPO_DB_FILE ]] && mv -f "$REPO_DB_FILE" "${REPO_DB_FILE}.old" -- 1.7.4.1

Ray Kohler

11:16 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...
On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove.

-d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there.

That's what checking the code bears out to me as well, but I think Allan's point is that -s and -v actually do apply to repo-remove.

How's this for usage output? ataraxia@asenath:~/code/pacman/scripts $ ./repo-add -h repo-add (pacman) 3.5.1-73-g72775-dirty Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ... repo-add will update a package database by reading a package file. Multiple packages to add can be specified on the command line. Options: -d, --delta generate and add delta for package update -f, --files update database's file list -q, --quiet minimize output -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update -v, --verify verify database's signature before update See repo-add(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options. Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz ataraxia@asenath:~/code/pacman/scripts $ ./repo-remove -h repo-remove (pacman) 3.5.1-73-g72775-dirty Usage: repo-remove [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> <packagename> ... repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple packages to remove can be specified on the command line. Options: -q, --quiet minimize output -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update -v, --verify verify database's signature before update See repo-remove(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options. Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26

Dan McGee

11:26 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...
On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove.

-d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there.

That's what checking the code bears out to me as well, but I think Allan's point is that -s and -v actually do apply to repo-remove.

How's this for usage output?

ataraxia@asenath:~/code/pacman/scripts $ ./repo-add -h repo-add (pacman) 3.5.1-73-g72775-dirty

Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ... repo-add will update a package database by reading a package file. Multiple packages to add can be specified on the command line.

Options: -d, --delta generate and add delta for package update -f, --files update database's file list -q, --quiet minimize output -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update -v, --verify verify database's signature before update

See repo-add(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.

Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz

ataraxia@asenath:~/code/pacman/scripts $ ./repo-remove -h repo-remove (pacman) 3.5.1-73-g72775-dirty

Usage: repo-remove [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> <packagename> ...

repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple packages to remove can be specified on the command line.

Options: -q, --quiet minimize output -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update -v, --verify verify database's signature before update

See repo-remove(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.

Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26

At quick glance, looks great to me. The manpage might be the next thing to tackle- find a good way to delineate the two sets of options, as it isn't that clear right now. -v is also missing it appears. -Dan

Ray Kohler

11:36 p.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote:

...
On 26/03/11 08:16, Dan McGee wrote:

...
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ray Kohler wrote: > > There were not added to the end of the list as that would mean > splitting the single gettext string that contains -f and the > "see the man page" message, and I wanted to do as little string > damage as possible.

Do string damage, it is a major release. But more importantly, repo-remove --help is going to show these and we might want to try and avoid that- I think the reason they weren't added here.

I think these options are still relevant to repo-remove.

-d and -f? If you remove an entry, the whole darn thing goes, regardless of whether there are deltas or files ...files in there.

That's what checking the code bears out to me as well, but I think Allan's point is that -s and -v actually do apply to repo-remove.

How's this for usage output?

ataraxia@asenath:~/code/pacman/scripts $ ./repo-add -h repo-add (pacman) 3.5.1-73-g72775-dirty

Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ... repo-add will update a package database by reading a package file. Multiple packages to add can be specified on the command line.

Options: -d, --delta generate and add delta for package update -f, --files update database's file list -q, --quiet minimize output -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update -v, --verify verify database's signature before update

See repo-add(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.

Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz

ataraxia@asenath:~/code/pacman/scripts $ ./repo-remove -h repo-remove (pacman) 3.5.1-73-g72775-dirty

Usage: repo-remove [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> <packagename> ...

repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple packages to remove can be specified on the command line.

Options: -q, --quiet minimize output -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update -v, --verify verify database's signature before update

See repo-remove(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.

Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26

At quick glance, looks great to me.

The manpage might be the next thing to tackle- find a good way to delineate the two sets of options, as it isn't that clear right now. -v is also missing it appears.

Ok, here's the second rev of this patch. Hopefully the code is as nice as the output it produces. I'll give the manpage a look as well.

...

From 4f8b33a5dcde821f843be2989afa5507621ad1eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ray Kohler Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:11:15 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Clean up repo-add usage message

This now includes -s and -v, tailors itself to the current command, and is formatted more like that of other pacman commands. Signed-off-by: Ray Kohler --- scripts/repo-add.sh.in | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in index bd2d90b..568f628 100644 --- a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in +++ b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in @@ -63,32 +63,39 @@ error() { # print usage instructions usage() { - printf "repo-add, repo-remove (pacman) %s\n\n" "$myver" - printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ...\n")" - printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-remove [-q] <path-to-db> ...\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ + cmd="$(basename $0)" + printf "%s (pacman) %s\n\n" "$cmd" "$myver" + if [[ $cmd == "repo-add" ]] ; then + printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ...\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ repo-add will update a package database by reading a package file.\n\ Multiple packages to add can be specified on the command line.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ + printf "$(gettext "Options:\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -d, --delta generate and add delta for package update\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -f, --files update database's file list\n")" + elif [[ $cmd == "repo-remove" ]] ; then + printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-remove [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ...\n\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name\n\ specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple\n\ packages to remove can be specified on the command line.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ -Use the -q/--quiet flag to minimize output to basic messages, warnings,\n\ -and errors.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ -Use the -d/--delta flag to automatically generate and add a delta file\n\ -between the old entry and the new one, if the old package file is found\n\ -next to the new one.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ -Use the -f/--files flag to update a database including file entries.\n\n -See repo-add(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.\n\n")" - echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz")" - echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26")" + printf "$(gettext "Options:\n")" + fi + printf "$(gettext " -q, --quiet minimize output\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -v, --verify verify database's signature before update\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\n\ +See %s(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.\n\n")" $cmd + if [[ $cmd == "repo-add" ]] ; then + echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz")" + elif [[ $cmd == "repo-remove" ]] ; then + echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26")" + fi } version() { - printf "repo-add, repo-remove (pacman) %s\n\n" "$myver" + cmd="$(basename $0)" + printf "%s (pacman) %s\n\n" "$cmd" "$myver" printf "$(gettext "\ Copyright (C) 2006-2008 Aaron Griffin .\n\ Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Dan McGee .\n\n\ -- 1.7.4.1

Dan McGee

28 Mar 28 Mar

1:38 a.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -s --sign and -v --verify to repo-add usage message.

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Ray Kohler wrote:

...

Ok, here's the second rev of this patch. Hopefully the code is as nice as the output it produces. I'll give the manpage a look as well.

Can you resend this as not base64 encoded, and using send-email? As an FYI, you can always comment below the triple dashes '---' in a patch email and that won't get applied in the final patch, instead of above the headers like you did. -Dan

Ray Kohler

2:04 a.m.

New subject: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Clean up repo-add usage message

This now includes -s and -v, tailors itself to the current command, and is formatted more like that of other pacman commands. Signed-off-by: Ray Kohler --- I don't know why it was base64'd - I guess Gmail did that, since I sent that one by pasting the content there? Thanks for the tip about where to put commentary like this. scripts/repo-add.sh.in | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in index bd2d90b..568f628 100644 --- a/scripts/repo-add.sh.in +++ b/scripts/repo-add.sh.in @@ -63,32 +63,39 @@ error() { # print usage instructions usage() { - printf "repo-add, repo-remove (pacman) %s\n\n" "$myver" - printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ...\n")" - printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-remove [-q] <path-to-db> ...\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ + cmd="$(basename $0)" + printf "%s (pacman) %s\n\n" "$cmd" "$myver" + if [[ $cmd == "repo-add" ]] ; then + printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-add [-d] [-f] [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ...\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ repo-add will update a package database by reading a package file.\n\ Multiple packages to add can be specified on the command line.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ + printf "$(gettext "Options:\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -d, --delta generate and add delta for package update\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -f, --files update database's file list\n")" + elif [[ $cmd == "repo-remove" ]] ; then + printf "$(gettext "Usage: repo-remove [-q] [-s] [-v] <path-to-db> ...\n\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\ repo-remove will update a package database by removing the package name\n\ specified on the command line from the given repo database. Multiple\n\ packages to remove can be specified on the command line.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ -Use the -q/--quiet flag to minimize output to basic messages, warnings,\n\ -and errors.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ -Use the -d/--delta flag to automatically generate and add a delta file\n\ -between the old entry and the new one, if the old package file is found\n\ -next to the new one.\n\n")" - printf "$(gettext "\ -Use the -f/--files flag to update a database including file entries.\n\n -See repo-add(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.\n\n")" - echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz")" - echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26")" + printf "$(gettext "Options:\n")" + fi + printf "$(gettext " -q, --quiet minimize output\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -s, --sign sign database with GnuPG after update\n")" + printf "$(gettext " -v, --verify verify database's signature before update\n")" + printf "$(gettext "\n\ +See %s(8) for more details and descriptions of the available options.\n\n")" $cmd + if [[ $cmd == "repo-add" ]] ; then + echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz pacman-3.0.0.pkg.tar.gz")" + elif [[ $cmd == "repo-remove" ]] ; then + echo "$(gettext "Example: repo-remove /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz kernel26")" + fi } version() { - printf "repo-add, repo-remove (pacman) %s\n\n" "$myver" + cmd="$(basename $0)" + printf "%s (pacman) %s\n\n" "$cmd" "$myver" printf "$(gettext "\ Copyright (C) 2006-2008 Aaron Griffin .\n\ Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Dan McGee .\n\n\ -- 1.7.4.1

4790

Age (days ago)

4793

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

13 comments

3 participants

participants (3)

Allan McRae
Dan McGee
Ray Kohler