- Arch-ports - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-ports] amarok-base 1.4.1-1 in Arch64
by Varun Acharya 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

Hi everyone, Does amarok-1.4.1 with the xine engine work ok for you in Arch64? I'm getting "xine-engine claims it cannot play MP3's". Please let me know so I can figure out if its a package problem or whether my installation is corrupt. ganja_guru

2 3

[arch-ports] [x86_64] flyspray is open for 64bit bugs
by Andreas Radke 16 Jul '06

16 Jul '06

Go on. But don't flood it too much :) AndyRTR

1 0

Re: [arch-ports] How to add a machine to the compil farm ?
by Blum 16 Jul '06

16 Jul '06

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 20:10, slubman wrote: > > Now that the x86_64 port is official we want to make it as good as > > ArchLinux (i686). You may have noticed that I'm doing most time a > > one-man-job. And that's now too much work for one person to keep all > > packages up to date in an acceptable time. > > > > Great news: i686 devs and also TUs want to help us. They offer their > > time to build the packages they maintain for a second time. > > > > What we need: a build farm running several machines Arch64. > > > > We will use pacbuild. The great distributed package building tool from > > Xentac. Read here more about it: > > > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacbuild and > > http://xentac.net/~jchu/blog/static/pacbuild > > > > i686 package maintainers and TrustedUsers will get accounts to sent > > pkgbuilds to the farm. The main server will send it further to a pc > > running the local build daemon. The more pcs we have running Arch64 with > > pacbuild daemon the lower the load will be. > > > > Who can offer his pc for running the pacbuild daemon? What you need: > > just a clean(!) Arch64 installation for correct linking. So there should > > be only official packages from current/extra and later community on it. > > A separate system would be nice but is not a must. > > > > Don't be afraid. There's no need to have a ssh deamon running. The > > system should be online most time. 24/7 up would be great. > > > > I will also offer one or two systems. We will test the > > configuration. > > > > It would be great to have more systems later running the build daemon so > > the nice load would get much lower. > > > > So who will join the packaging party? > > > > AndyRTR > > Hello > > I wan't to add my arch64 to the "farm". Do i have to send the mail to the > guy in the wiki, or is someone else responsible for the arch64 port ? I cant't find an answer of this question too... I asked Jason for username and password for the x86_64 farm but no answer yet.

2 1

[arch-ports] [archppc] Kernel 2.6.17 Progress
by James Turner 12 Jul '06

12 Jul '06

I was just wondering how the 2.6.17 kernel progress was going. I'm very excited to finally have Airport Extreme support right in the kernel.

3 3

[arch-ports] How to add a machine to the compil farm ?
by slubman 12 Jul '06

12 Jul '06

> Now that the x86_64 port is official we want to make it as good as > ArchLinux (i686). You may have noticed that I'm doing most time a > one-man-job. And that's now too much work for one person to keep all > packages up to date in an acceptable time. > > Great news: i686 devs and also TUs want to help us. They offer their > time to build the packages they maintain for a second time. > > What we need: a build farm running several machines Arch64. > > We will use pacbuild. The great distributed package building tool from > Xentac. Read here more about it: > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacbuild and > http://xentac.net/~jchu/blog/static/pacbuild > > i686 package maintainers and TrustedUsers will get accounts to sent > pkgbuilds to the farm. The main server will send it further to a pc > running the local build daemon. The more pcs we have running Arch64 with > pacbuild daemon the lower the load will be. > > Who can offer his pc for running the pacbuild daemon? What you need: > just a clean(!) Arch64 installation for correct linking. So there should > be only official packages from current/extra and later community on it. > A separate system would be nice but is not a must. > > Don't be afraid. There's no need to have a ssh deamon running. The > system should be online most time. 24/7 up would be great. > > I will also offer one or two systems. We will test the > configuration. > > It would be great to have more systems later running the build daemon so > the nice load would get much lower. > > So who will join the packaging party? > > AndyRTR Hello I wan't to add my arch64 to the "farm". Do i have to send the mail to the guy in the wiki, or is someone else responsible for the arch64 port ? -- slubman (aka Nicolas DOUALOT) mail: slubman(a)slubman.net jabber ID: slubman(a)kdetalk.net site: http://www.slubman.net

1 0

[arch-ports] [x86_64] prefer ftp-install to avoid glibc upgrade issues
by Andreas Radke 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

FTP install is now possible from all mirrors again and should be the prefered way to install a fresh Arch64 from now on to not go in trouble with the glibc update. Also our current repo is fresh as the 32bit one again :) http://home.arcor.de/a.radke/arch64/list/pkg_diff.html Updating extra packages and a new ISO will be the next steps. AndyRTR

2 3

[arch-ports] New packages and /lib, upgrade system failed
by Robert Stefaniuk 06 Jul '06

06 Jul '06

I installed arch64 from bootable iso and then upgraded whole system with packages from archlinux.org. During update kernel it started complaining: "cannod load shared object - no such file" about libraries: libblkid.so.1 and libreadline.so.5 Then later on the system freezed. I rebooted, and I couldn't boot with arch kernel ( pacman didn't make proper image yet ), my own kernel too ( after initrd removal: kernel panic - not sync - cannot find init - try "init=" parametrer ) and of course my own kernel started be I see that libraries are divided between /lib and /lib64 dirs and /lib64 contains missing two: libblkid.so.1 and libreadline.so.5 So maybe you have suggestions what to do now or before ;) Best regards, thanks to the devs Robert

4 4

[arch-ports] arch64 bootable iso - hotplug needed
by Robert Stefaniuk 03 Jul '06

03 Jul '06

Hi! Arch64 bootable iso doesn't have hotplug, and I can't get my network connection working. I connect by Sagem 800 ASDL modem ( kernel module ueagle-atm ) and I am not able to upload firmware. And I can't download this package without net :D There can be other packages required for some people to get network working and maybe you could consider including them For example in my country, Poland, a lot of people use this modem, because main telephony company provides connection based on it. Best regards, Robert ( Casper ) Stefaniuk

3 2

Re: [arch-ports] [ArchPPC] Help regarding the install procedure
by James Turner 30 Jun '06

30 Jun '06

> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:53:12PM -0400, James Turner wrote: >>>>> james(a)nullstudios.com wrote: >>>>>>> James Turner wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, I'm a new archlinux user and new to this mailing list, so >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> take it easy on me. I am having a hell of a time getting >>>>>>>> archlinux >>>>>>>> installed on my 12in PowerBook 1.33 GHz. I have followed the >>>>>>>> steps >>>>>>>> under "*Installation on newworld machines" numerous times with >>>>>>>> various >>>>>>>> success. Most recently quickinst seems to stale for no reason >>>>>>>> while >>>>>>>> downloading packages. The one time I managed to get archlinux >>>>>>>> completely installed the kernel would not boot. If anyone has >>>>>>>> more up >>>>>>>> to date instructions or any ideas why the quickinst script >>>>>>>> might be >>>>>>>> stalling please help. Once I get the base system installed I >>>>>>>> can always >>>>>>>> compile my own kernel. I appreciate any help anyone might be >>>>>>>> able to >>>>>>>> offer.* >>>>>>> Except for the devfs vs udev issues, the guide still fully >>>>>>> applies. It >>>>>>> may be that you run into problems if you use the sample >>>>>>> yaboot.conf. >>>>>>> Did you use ofpath to determine your "device" and "partition" >>>>>>> lines? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You may try the latest snapshot which is here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ftp://ftp.archlinuxppc.org/iso/snapshots/ >>>>>>> 2006-06-14_archppc.iso.bz2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It still has a few flaws which need to be fixed: >>>>>>> * does not create device nodes for harddrives use instead: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cd /dev >>>>>>> mknod hda b 3 0 >>>>>>> mknod hda1 b 3 1 >>>>>>> mknod hda2 b 3 2 >>>>>>> mknod hda3 b 3 3 >>>>>>> mknod hdb b 4 1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a.s.o >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>> Alex, Thanks for your help. I did manage to get ArchLinux >>>>>> installed >>>>>> just fine last night. I followed the above procedure. I also >>>>>> had to >>>>>> mknod nvram c 10 144, so yaboot would install correctly and I >>>>>> had to >>>>>> run modprobe loop so the kernel would install correctly. I can >>>>>> proudly >>>>>> say I am writing this from ArchLinux on my 12in PowerBook. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Glad to hear you were successful! :D >>>>> >>>>> Just now I uploaded yet another snapshot: >>>>> >>>>> ftp://ftp.archlinuxppc.org/iso/snapshots/ >>>>> 2006-06-16_archppc.iso.bz2 >>>>> >>>>> The hardware detection should work fine plus /dev is now properly >>>>> filled. What's left is to modify the "graphical" setup script, >>>>> which I >>>>> am in the middle of doing right now. So whenever you feel like it >>>>> try >>>>> the newer ones too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers! >>>>> >>>>> Alex >>>>> >>>> I tried the new iso with out much luck. It detected all my >>>> hardware >>>> correctly and populated /dev just fine. My problem was trying >>>> to run >>>> quickinst. Since wget isn't installed I tried the version located >>>> in /arch. For whatever reason it was unable to resolve >>>> ftp.archlinuxppc.org. I double checked my /etc/resolv.conf and it >>>> had the correct nameservers listed. I used dhcpd to configure my >>>> network device if that means anything. I tried manually setting it >>>> but route is also not installed. Anyone have any ideas? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> The latest iso should come with the default quickinst script as in >>> i686, >>> so it uses snarf instead of wget now. I will check what may have >>> produced the problem. Though I'll doubt the iso doesn't have the >>> required symbols in its libc, like it used to on some of the other >>> isos. >>> >>> Alex >>> >> After trying out the iso again, I am able to ping ip's outside my >> network just fine, but still nothing is resolving. Let me know if >> there's anything I can run on my machine to better help you find the >> problem. > > You're still running quickinst right? I'll put strace on the next disk > to debug it a little more. Can only be something in pacman or snarf. > Unfortunatley I won't have much time tonight as I have to prep an art > show. :) > > Alex > In hopes to better help you out with the debug, here is the procedure I am following with the new iso. dhcpd eth0 mac-fdisk /dev/hda mkfs.ext3 /dev/hda4 mkswap /dev/hda5 mount -t ext3 /dev/hda4 /mnt /arch/quickinst ftp /mnt ftp://ftp.archlinuxppc.org/current/os/ppc Then these errors are outputted: mount: can't find / in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab Downloading pacman... ftp.archlinuxppc.org: Unknown server error error: Download failed And here is my /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 68.87.77.130 Take your time, like I said I was able to get archlinux installed with the previous iso and old walkthrough. If you need any help with anything let me know.

3 4

Re: [arch-ports] [archppc] quickinst troubles
by James Turner 29 Jun '06

29 Jun '06

Also, do you guys over a rsync server like archlinux.org so I can get a local repository? ------------------------------------------------------------ James Turner <james(a)calminferno.net> http://calminferno.net

1 0