[arch-dev-public] status of xfce-svn

Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Mon Apr 2 16:02:53 EDT 2007


2007/4/2, Tom K <tom at archlinux.org>:
> Andreas Radke wrote:
> > Am Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:24:20 +0300
> > schrieb "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Just one addition: IMO xfmedia should be moved from community to
> >> extra, same for xfburn (there's xfburn-svn only though).
> >
> > +1 to move those 2 packages even in this early state.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch-dev-public mailing list
> > arch-dev-public at archlinux.org
> > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public
> >
>
> xfmedia, maybe - although it is described as "beta-quality, and likely
> has bugs" on its own website. I maintained it for a while in community,
> and it never felt particularly solid.
> xfburn? I see no reason why this should go in extra, when its own devs
> don't even consider it stable enough to release at all.
>
> I'd put them both in unstable myself.

Hm, what about squeeze then? Is it stable? (just asking)

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)


More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list