[arch-dev-public] new flac
Jan de Groot
jan at jgc.homeip.net
Wed Aug 1 11:12:04 EDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 10:43 -0400, Paul Mattal wrote:
> Jan de Groot wrote:
> > Thanks for not using checkpkg to check that the soname bumped from .so.7 to
> > .so.8. We need to rebuild all packages that link to libflac. This should
> > have gone to testing, and you would have known if you had used checkpkg.
> I did use checkpkg. This is how I noticed this, and why I sent this email.
> It sounds like you expected I would do something different. If so, we
> should put that in a document somewhere so that we can all know what to
> do. If such a document exists, please point me to it.
Well, usually, when a basic package like a codec where >15 packages
depend on has a sobump, these packages go to testing first to give
developers chance to rebuild. If they go to current directly instead,
the packages that depend on it should be rebuilt during the same run of
db-extra/db-arch. Wasn't this one of the reasons we have testing?
More information about the arch-dev-public