[arch-dev-public] Definition of non-free for repo-reorg

[Simo Leone]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:25:49AM +1000, James Rayner wrote:
> If we do separate "non-free" and "free" in the new repo layout, what will
> be the definition of "non-free"?
> 
> Will anything closed source be non-free (acroread, nvidia)? or only things
> that have license/patent/distribution issues, like codecs?
> 
I still don't see the need. We've never bothered in the past and it's
just making things more complicated, why bother now? 

-S
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20070711/a1fbdf57/attachment.pgp>