[arch-dev-public] why?

Aaron Griffin aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Thu Jul 19 15:02:21 EDT 2007

On 7/19/07, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa at solnet.ch> wrote:
> * why renaming the current repo? current and extra make perfectly
> sense in the KISS approach to me.

My biggest problem is grammar.  "current" and "extra" don't follow
each other.  "less" and "more", "east" and "west", "monday" and
"saturday" - all these words are related in some way.

"current" and "extra" don't make any sense? If "current" is current,
does that mean extra is not current? Is current more up to date than
current? "extra" what? More extra than "current"? Does that mean it's
from the future?

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list