[arch-dev-public] we want to give x86_64 a new direction

Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Sun May 13 06:16:07 EDT 2007

2007/5/13, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> On 5/12/07, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de> wrote:
> > forcing us into the same scm tree makes us a bit unflexible. so i would
> > prefer to have an own tree back again. but i could also imagine to keep
> > one common scm where we just "tag" our versions a bit behind i686.
> I don't see a problem with the updates lagging behind.  You guys do
> have your own CVS tags so it should affect either side.  If we tag
> something 'CURRENT', the db update scripts check only that tag - the
> 64bit scripts check only 'CURRENT-64'
> As far as I can tell, we should be able to keep everything exactly as
> is, and you guys just do your updates slower than us - that's not a
> big deal to me at all.

The current SVN structure is:
Will slower updates fit this as well?
Something like /<packagename>/branches/x86_64 ?

> > if you are fine with that i want to bring up 2 new packagers as a first
> > step.
> Sounds good to me.

sure, it's very good.

Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list