[arch-dev-public] The Arch-ization of packages

[Tobias Powalowski]

Am Samstag, 3. November 2007 schrieb Andreas Radke:
> Do we really need there rules? Can't we let the decision up to the
> maintainer?
>
> If we really need a rule I vote for providing packages pure upstream
> with a post.install message how to get it archiefied. Either with cp -f
> an included archiefied config/splash/theme over the default one or
> to show what additional package will provide the related Arch stuff.
>
> Andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch-dev-public mailing list
> arch-dev-public at archlinux.org
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public

Im against the non archifying, on screenshots you only see the distro that 
runs because of the wallpaper or splash screens nowhere else.

greetings
tpowa
-- 
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tpowa at archlinux.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20071103/4db1606e/attachment.pgp>