[arch-dev-public] rebuilding the whole core repo

Eric Belanger belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Wed Nov 7 14:36:49 EST 2007

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Daniel Isenmann wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:41:45 +0100
> Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:32:48 +0100
>> Daniel Isenmann <daniel.isenmann at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>>> Let me do some more work on it. After the first run, I will post
>>>>> here some showstoppers for automatic rebuilds (e.g. source not
>>>>> found or wrong md5sums and such things for fixing it in the
>>>>> PKGBUILD).
> Ok, here is the second list with core/lib, core/devel and core/support:
> core/lib: everything build fine
> core/devel:
> fakeroot:
> 	source doesn't exists anymore on server
> gcc:
> 	libstdc++-4.2.0.tar.bz2 doesn't exists anymore on server
> core/support:
> bcm43xx-fwcutter:
> 	missing arch-tag in PKGBUILD
> capi4k-utils:
> 	compiling fails with errors
> gpm:
> 	compiling fails with errors
> madwifi-utils:
> 	depends on 'sharutils', which is in [extra]
> rt2x00-cvs:
> 	depends on command 'cvs', which is in [extra]
> wlan-ng26-utils:
> 	compiling fails with errors
> wlan-ng26:
> 	fails, because of missing -util package, see error above
> That's all of [core] repo. I think, those things should be fixed first
> and maybe the missing/wrong license tag, too. I hope, that every
> maintainer of his package can fix those things. They are all nearly
> small things to change in the PKGBUILD.
> After fixing those things, we can think about rebuilding the whole core
> repo completly and put it to [testing] first.
> Daniel

There is also eventlog which is missing from the repo. Is everybody OK 
with having it readded in the core repo instead of extra?


This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list