[arch-dev-public] Package removal update
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Tue Nov 27 16:04:13 EST 2007
On Nov 27, 2007 2:33 PM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On Nov 27, 2007 7:33 AM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> >> It seems we should support dump for filesystems we support. I'll
> >> take dump into core if desired. Or we could move xfsdump and dump
> >> both into extra.
> > I agree we should stay consistent, but how important are these apps? I
> > know I've never used or heard of anyone using them. I'd guess they're
> > recovery type tools, but we have a lot of those in extra already.
> > Would anyone have a problem with both of them being in extra?
> I think having both in extra would be fine. If someone moves
> xfsdump, I'll bring dump up from unsupported to extra and maintain it.
Done, moved xfsdump to extra.
More information about the arch-dev-public