[arch-dev-public] Package removal update
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Wed Nov 28 13:24:19 EST 2007
On Nov 27, 2007 3:04 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 2:33 PM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> > Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 7:33 AM, Paul Mattal <paul at mattal.com> wrote:
> > >> It seems we should support dump for filesystems we support. I'll
> > >> take dump into core if desired. Or we could move xfsdump and dump
> > >> both into extra.
> > >
> > > I agree we should stay consistent, but how important are these apps? I
> > > know I've never used or heard of anyone using them. I'd guess they're
> > > recovery type tools, but we have a lot of those in extra already.
> > > Would anyone have a problem with both of them being in extra?
> > I think having both in extra would be fine. If someone moves
> > xfsdump, I'll bring dump up from unsupported to extra and maintain it.
> Done, moved xfsdump to extra.
xfsdump needs a rebuild to remove its groups entry, since it is no
longer in base.
More information about the arch-dev-public