[arch-dev-public] Best practice for consecutive signoffs?
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 13:44:50 EST 2007
On Nov 29, 2007 12:30 PM, Tom K <tom at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Dan has shadow 188.8.131.52-8 in testing, pending signoff. Meanwhile, I have
> shadow 184.108.40.206-1 ready to upload - new upstream ver +
> bugfixes/requests. Do I wait for 220.127.116.11-8 to go to core, or will I
> replace Dan's package with mine in testing?
Good question... I'd say replace it. I just did that with openssh. I
mean, odds are this will generally be coordinated between developers
or a single developer doing it. This is a little different because Dan
probably didn't get emails for all the shadow bugs you were fixing 8)
More information about the arch-dev-public