[arch-dev-public] Additional Package ISOs
jason at archlinux.org
Thu Sep 27 21:38:37 EDT 2007
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:22:53AM +0200, Damir Perisa wrote:
> Friday 28 September 2007, Jason Chu wrote:
> | On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:59:00AM +0200, Damir Perisa wrote:
> | > Friday 28 September 2007, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> | > | * A small script which constructs a repo from a list of
> | > | packages, then runs mkisofs on it. This would allow users to
> | > | very easily create a CD or DVD full of packages THEY want.
> | >
> | > +1
> | > maybe in addition to the script, if the downloading needs to
> | > happen at school (windows, mac!) it is maybe helpful to provide
> | > in addition an easy xsl(mozilla) or java tool for this (platform
> | > independend). or we provide the script in all platform versions.
> | > or the script is run by webinterface and the iso file is
> | > generated on the server a priori to downloading it.
> | -1 on the xsl or java tool at least initially. I'm not going to
> | write it or maintain it... it will have to stay in sync with all
> | the other code we have in pacman.
> not pacman but repositories. it would be a rewrite in java of pacman
> fetching and dependency resolving mechanism.
And the repository generation code...
> | > instead i have a conter-proposition: we need a prespecified repo
> | > on optical drive in pacman.conf (e.g. /media/mobilerepo/os/i686
> | > or something like this) and then this huge additional medium has
> | > the repo at exactly this place. i think with a medium label kept
> | > unique and HAL you can make it mount automatically and always
> | > at /media/mobilerepo
> | I do mind automounting the medium to a special place. If someone
> | needs to mount a repo DVD, there should be instructions somewhere
> | and it shouldn't be very hard to do anyway (1. edit
> | /etc/pacman.conf 2. mount DVD). Doing something special to access
> | this DVD in a different place is a bad idea.
> i agree about the "special". the idea behind special is to be "same"
> for all archlinux installations. this way, the 1) edit pacman.conf
> would just mean removing the #, since every machine mounts the
> additional media with additional repo on the same place. the whole
> thing however is purely detail. i agree with you that making it very
> special is not needed... but if somebody has two optical drives, the
> disc will be HAL-mounted in /media/cd or /media/cd1 or wherever, but
> if you specify a rule on the label for example, then it will always
> be where we want it to be, making editing pacman.conf obsolete.
Yeah, but the argument is changing a couple characters in a commented out
/etc/pacman.conf line or pre-configuring HAL to mount a disk with a certain
label in a different place. I really think that the pacman.conf edit will
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the arch-dev-public