[arch-dev-public] The move to SVN
travis at archlinux.org
Thu Apr 3 14:08:14 EDT 2008
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Jason Chu <jason at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:54:44PM -0400, Travis Willard wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:54 AM, eliott <eliott at cactuswax.net> wrote:
> > > On 4/3/08, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > So, what do I need from you? Nothing. I'm making this easy in that I
> > > > > will do all the work. I just need one thing: give me a day when it is
> > > > > best. When you all want to take a mini-vacation and do no packaging at
> > > > > all. If no one has a good day for this, I will probably do it on
> > > > > Thursday or Friday.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, so. I need to fly out for a business trip tonight (anyone in Vegas
> > > > today and tomorrow?). I was hoping to actually do this today, but that
> > > > fell through. I will be back on Saturday, so I plan on doing this
> > > > then, starting about 10am CST on Saturday.
> > > >
> > > > One request:
> > > > Could you guys take a peek at the web-based viewers out there and let
> > > > me know what you'd prefer?
> > > > Items of interest:
> > > > http://www.bluestatic.org/software/viewsvn/
> > > > http://www.viewvc.org/
> > > > http://websvn.tigris.org/
> > > > http://trac.edgewall.org/
> > >
> > > I don't think trac would be a good fit, as it does wiki and bugtracking too.
> > I really haven't ever used anything other than ViewVC so I don't have
> > a good basis for comparison.
> > However, this brings up an interesting (if somewhat offtopic, sorry)
> > point - if we used Trac, could we integrate our package bugtracking
> > directly with our repo, so that the issue could associate itself with
> > the package in SVN? Would that even be useful? There was talk about
> > how flyspray sucked recently, IIRC, so this could be an integrated
> > replacement.
> In general I'm not happy with Trac's wiki and bug tracker. Trac took all
> the simplest stuff and put it together so none of it is really good, it's
> just combined.
Fair enough - glad to hear from someone with experience in the matter.
I was just throwing it out there as a possibility. :)
More information about the arch-dev-public