[arch-dev-public] Rsync to [core]
Dan McGee
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 10:23:45 EDT 2008
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Travis Willard <travis at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Simo Leone <simo at archlinux.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:35:34PM -0700, eliott wrote:
> > > > > Fine with it, as long as you move csup out too (extra for now, maybe
> > > > > community/unsupported down the road?).
> > > >
> > > > My opinion would be move abs to extra, along with rsync.
> > > > It is only that though, an opinion. I guess I don't have strong
> > > > feelings about it.
> > > >
> > > I agree, it doesn't really fit in that "must have" category. But like
> > > eliott, I'm surprisingly indifferent.
> >
> > Agreed. ABS is not system critical. Hell, even devtools and namcap are in extra.
>
> Hm - fair enough. :P I guess I'll still be moving package around, but
> not in the order I originally expected. :P
Pretty indifferent here as well, I guess I just remembered some talk
way back of core being system critical stuff, but *also* being a
completely self-contained way to build an Arch system from scratch. I
thought that was a big reason why we would want to keep it there.
Luckily with SVN we can move this package back and forth without
hassle, except for Travis going crazy. :)
-Dan
More information about the arch-dev-public
mailing list