[arch-dev-public] Risky business: udev upgrade

[Aaron Griffin]

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Eric Belanger
<belanger at astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> Also, /etc/start_udev refers to /sbin/udevtrigger and /sbin/udevsettle.
> These binaries are missing in udev-126-2. If they were removed on purpose,
> then start_udev should be updated.

start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
update initscripts when they updated udev.... or something.. I can't
remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting
their systems to boot fine.

Is everyone ok with removing it?

> And, 51-arch.rules is being installed in /etc/udev/rules.d. Shouldn't it go
> in the new location?

Whoopsy.

> BTW, udev 127 is out (or will be out soon).

Rebuilding and committing then