[arch-dev-public] Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions
roman.kyrylych at gmail.com
Sun Feb 10 03:43:29 EST 2008
2008/2/10, Travis Willard <travis at archlinux.org>:
> Ok guys,
> I've been talking to the AMD/ATI guys about getting ArchLinux packages
> bundled with their catalyst releases, and was told something
> interesting - apparently, the driver (kernel/Xorg) is independent of
> the catalyst release, and is still versioned the "old way" - for
> example, we used to have "fglrx 8.45.4" or whatever, and I changed it
> to "catalyst YY.MM" when AMD started releasing their linux drivers as
> 'catalyst'. The thing with this is, there may be special versions of
> the driver between catalyst releases for certain vendors, for example
> - so catalyst 8.01 may have driver (fglrx) version 8.45.5, but then
> they release a special version for laptop X that's 8.45.6, and isn't a
> catalyst release, as it's geared to the specific laptop's hardware.
> So, basically, I jumped the gun renaming fglrx to catalyst, as (in
> general) it makes more sense to keep versioning it the old way (which,
> at the time, I thought was going away, and was mistaken).
> So, what I'm wondering is, should I re-rename the packages back to
> fglrx? Leave them catalyst, and ignore any special versions that may,
> at some point in the future, come out? Re-rename them to something
> other than 'fglrx' to indicate they're the Radeon Proprietary drivers?
> I'm not sure how to handle this, and suggestions are more than
> I asked the ATI guys the same thing, and they said they'd prefer to
> have some 'meta-package' called catalyst that depends on the
> appropriate fglrx-* packages, which I don't really like, because then
> the 'catalyst' package is an empty package, used only for the deps it
> pulls in.
I don't mind renaming them back to fglrx again. *shrugs*
For extra-special versions - I doubt they will ever be in our repo.
Meta-package is definetely a bad idea, we've got rid of most of them
Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst
depends on our packaging scheme?
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
More information about the arch-dev-public