[arch-dev-public] Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions
travis at archlinux.org
Wed Feb 13 13:58:00 EST 2008
On Feb 10, 2008 3:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst
> depends on our packaging scheme?
Basically yes - the way it's set up to do distribution-specific
packaging essentially expects you to create 'fglrx' packages.
I think we can do without the metapackage again, though.
More information about the arch-dev-public