[arch-dev-public] Catalyst naming - looking for suggestions

[Travis Willard]

On Feb 10, 2008 3:43 AM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the decission to include Arch support in the official catalyst
> depends on our packaging scheme?

Basically yes - the way it's set up to do distribution-specific
packaging essentially expects you to create 'fglrx' packages.

I think we can do without the metapackage again, though.