[arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of extra/multimedia/miro (ChangeLog PKGBUILD)

[Varun Acharya]

On Jan 4, 2008 1:59 AM, Travis Willard <travis at archlinux.org> wrote:

> On Jan 3, 2008 3:20 PM, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa at solnet.ch> wrote:
>
> > Thursday 03 January 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
> >  | On Jan 3, 2008 3:00 PM, Damir Perisa <damir.perisa at solnet.ch>
> > wrote:
> >  | > Thursday 03 January 2008, Varun Acharya wrote:
> >  | >  | Index: extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLog
> >  | >  | diff -u /dev/null extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLog:1.1
> >  | >  | --- /dev/nullThu Jan 3 14:48:51 2008
> >  | >  | +++ extra/multimedia/miro/ChangeLogThu Jan 3 14:48:51
> >  | >
> >  | > why is the Changelog in CVS?
> >  |
> >  | Because pacman supports changelogs.  That's the changelog for the
> >  | package, not the upstream software.
> >
> > i must have missed something! /me goes reading emails...
> >
>
> pacman -Qc will show the changelog.  I think there's a tool to make
> changelogs too, where you can specify what goes in them.
>
> On Jan 3, 2008 3:17 PM, Dan McGee < dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > why is the Changelog in CVS?
> >
> > Of bigger things to notice, I did see you put your entry at the bottom
> > instead of the top. The rest of the orders were chronological from the
> > bottom up, and ChangeLogs are usually in that order.
> >
>
> Good catch - I missed that.  Yeah, Varun's changelog entry is on the wrong
> end of the log.
>

Thanks for pointing this out. I actually committed the ChangeLog by
accident, and looks like something good came out of it..I assume were
supposed to commit the ChangeLog now,( based on what travis had to say)?
I'll switch to more conventional log entry style next time, no problem.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20080104/5ef4d738/attachment.htm>