[arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.0

[Travis Willard]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de> wrote:
> Is there a certain reason why pacman.static has been removed? I used it
> a lot when playing with glibc upgrades that often break the dynamic
> pacman. Is there any replacement?

It also ended up being pretty useful when pacman started linking
against libarchive and libdownload (libfetch?), IIRC - of course, that
was compounded by a pacman issue (it didn't download its own deps when
upgrading itself) that has since been fixed.